Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

2136

reference
71-tree-1
name
2136
tree-preservation-order

undefined

71-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.938063 50.845393)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.938006 50.845387,-0.938009 50.845398,-0.938016 50.845408,-0.938029 50.845416,-0.938045 50.845421,-0.938062 50.845423,-0.938080 50.845422,-0.938096 50.845417,-0.938108 50.845409,-0.938117 50.845399,-0.938120 50.845388,-0.938117 50.845377,-0.938109 50.845367,-0.938097 50.845359,-0.938081 50.845353,-0.938064 50.845351,-0.938046 50.845353,-0.938030 50.845358,-0.938017 50.845366,-0.938009 50.845376,-0.938006 50.845387)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL